Greetings

First of all......

* As we upgrade and build new....

  I think it is time to eliminate atmospherically vented appliances from the breathing zones of our homes

* I realize that the effects of wind and mechanical equipment can and often do overwhelm Stack Effect.

 

My current favorite online resources for visualizing "Stack Effect" are.....

*John Straube's Article

http://www.buildingscience.com/documents/digests/bsd-014-air-flow-c...

 

*John Klote's Article

http://fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/fire91/PDF/f91013.pdf

 

*Bud Poll's Worksheet

http://myenergyworkshop.homestead.com/hot-air.html

 

I plan to post some Illustrations and see if you folks agree with my current thinking about the location of Neutral Pressure Planes

Meanwhile...

Does anyone else have suggestions for online links concerning  "Stack Effect"?

Views: 4763

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

An important element of the Klote report is that he uses a simplifying formula that only approximates the typical multiple vertical opening model.

"Analytic equations have been developed for the location of the neutral pressure plane for a few simple cases of leakage openings. However, the combinations of leakage openings in building shafts and compartments can be very complex... Analysis is simpler for horizontal openings, because the pressure difference across the opening does not vary with elevation. The analysis of this section is for horizontal openings…Vertical vents can be approximated by horizontal vents when the height of each vent is small compared to the height of the air column."

In a 2500 SF house with 1 ACH50 (about 350 CFM50), the Effective Leakage Area (ELA @ 4 Pa) is about 8 square inches. Since the blower door test is conducted with deliberate leaks sealed, this envelope leakage area is similar to what we might expect from dampered mechanical openings, making both deliberate and accidental leakage areas equally significant.

I'm still not sure what you're trying to accomplish by "controlling" the height of the NPP, especially given that - as you attest - the actual NPP will vary with both wind and mechanical effects.

Here's another link to an old article, CBD-23. Air Leakage in Buildings, from the National Research Council of Canada:

http://archive.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/eng/ibp/irc/cbd/building-digest-23.html

RSS

Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy,) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.  Home Energy Pros is sponsored by the Better Buildings Residential Network.

Latest Activity

Profile IconMichael Laurie, Randall Herlihy, Matt Risinger and 1 more joined Home Energy Pros
1 hour ago
Quinn Korzeniecki added a discussion to the group Building Performance Institute (BPI)
Thumbnail

Obama Announced New Actions to Bring Energy Efficiency to Households across the Country

Big news out of The White House last week for the ‪‎clean energy‬ housing sector: HUD and DOE have…See More
2 hours ago
Theresa L Gilbride posted a blog post

Find out whose building some of the best-performing homes in the country today with DOE’s Tour of Zero

Home buyers across the country can find out where the home of the future is available today with…See More
2 hours ago
Colin Genge commented on Chris Laumer-Giddens's blog post Building Science is Worthless...
"We has passive house tester complaining the Aluminum Frame leaked too much so we measured them at…"
4 hours ago
Michael Dunseith posted a photo
5 hours ago
Michael Dunseith replied to Kim Tanner's discussion Fantastic innovation
"It was designed for air handlers to determine the total system air flow. I It would be installed in…"
5 hours ago
John Kaye posted a status
"Looking for contributing writer who know & understand EEM's"
11 hours ago
John Kaye posted a status
"If you're a Realtor please email me for the next meet-up in San Gabriel, CA"
11 hours ago

© 2015   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service