I'm wondering if anyone out there has come across specific language for the attachment of fiberglass insulation over an unconditioned crawl space.  I realize there are various ways to accomplish proper installation where the insulation material makes contact with the floor diaphragm.  Personally I prefer to see the use of nylon twine as a means of attachment and I'm wondering if anyone happens to know of any recommended spacing guidelines for the attachment points of a zig zag pattern of twine when used for support of floor insulation.

Views: 4438

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Replies to This Discussion

That all makes sense. Having spent the last 20 years building and remodeling homes and only the last 4 concentrating on building science and weatherization, I am still trying to figure out what many of you veterans have already learned. I thank you for the responses and your time.

See section 3.2 of the ENERGY STAR TERC guidelines

From the "Retrofit Workforce Guidelines" (which are still in critical care & unavailable at the moment - but from my review)

7.36 Accessible Floors (between conditioned & unconditioned space) – personally not the best choice down south, but that’s for another day

  • 7.36.1: Sealing the floor system will be completed before installing – very nicely stated
  • 7.36.2: Insulation will be installed in contact with subfloor without gaps, voids, compressions, misalignments, or wind intrusions & If kraft-faced batts are used, they will be installed with kraft facing to subfloor  - also very nicely stated (though kraft is worse thing you can use)
  • 7.36.3: Batts will be secured with physical fasteners TO ensure insulation remains in contact with subfloor – the only issue is that they also need to minimize compression while still keeping it from sagging

I assume you're aware of the latest Building Science rant from Dr. Joe in which he argues against the requirement that insulation be in contact with subfloor (I excerpt it here at http://homeenergypros.lbl.gov/forum/topics/another-irreverent-whine...), and will try to get this changed in the next IRC code revision.

But why do you say that Kraft facing is a problem? It meets the IRC guideline for a 1 perm vapor retarder.

Thanks Robert & yes I am but that doesn't apply to the here, now or the question posed. 

As for the question about the kraft - no matter where you are at, if one is going to use such a product the last thing you want is water being trapped against it & the subfloor whether it is from moisture in the air, over active cleaners, plumbing leaks, or water splashed from tubs, showers, or sinks. Maybe you guys have less issues up north, but down here unfaced FG is bad enough & the kraft style seemingly just makes it worse

RSS

Welcome to Home Energy Pros

Welcome to Home Energy Pros – the unique digital community by and for those who work in the home energy performance arena.

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (supported by the U.S. Department of Energy) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.  Home Energy Pros is sponsored by the Better Buildings Residential Network. Please honor our Guidelines

Blogs

First-Ever Comprehensive National Standard Practice Manual is Updated Guidebook for Energy Efficiency Cost-Benefit Analysis

Posted by Home Energy Magazine on May 23, 2017 at 9:30am 0 Comments

The first-ever comprehensive national guide for utility-funded energy efficiency programs is now available to help utilities, regulators and other interested…

Continue

New Video and Course on Solar PV in Real Estate

Posted by Amber Vignieri on May 16, 2017 at 11:31am 0 Comments

Real estate professionals who understand the basics of solar and know how to market the benefits of an installation will have a market edge. For most real estate agents and appraisers, assessing the value of solar is a new…

Continue

What Happen to Energy Upgrade California?

Posted by Will johnson on May 15, 2017 at 11:43am 0 Comments

Energy Upgrade California offers rebates up to $6,500.00 in SDGE territory.  Up to $4,500 in other territories.  Unfortunately they don't/won't promote it.  I can't get straight candid answers from the contractors supporting the program.  Only…

Continue

Latest Activity

robert jones posted a status
"I have energy auditing equipment for sale. I'm in the 518. 518-209-5912"
4 minutes ago
Home Energy Magazine posted a blog post
29 minutes ago
Home Energy Magazine posted a video

Gary Nelson, The Energy Conservatory

Gary Nelson- Home Energy Magazine's "Legends of Home Performance" video series. Interviews with pioneer pathfinders of energy and water efficiency.
31 minutes ago
Kelly Vaughn posted a blog post
2 hours ago

© 2017   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service