Is there equipment available or testing methodology for calculating the R values of walls and ceilings in the field.

Tags: Calc, Field, R, Values

Views: 94

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Yes and no!

There is one instrument that sticks a couple of thermocouples against a surface and then calculates an r-value and then there are the surface temperature graph which yield another r-value number.  I use a graph when necessary, but that is only part of the observation.  An IR scan then gives me more insight as to what is happening behind the surface.  The type of insulation helps me judge how it is performing.  Is the solar exposure affecting those IR readings?  Is the orientation, horizontal vs vertical, makeing a difference.  Encapsulated on 6 sides or exposed to air flow.  Plywood sheathing or old boards on the outside?  And then the big question.  What number would the next technician use and is this truing for fuel consumption or just a model?

If you get carried away with accuracy you stand alone with results that no one else will arrive at.  It makes you feel good, but everyone else will say you are wrong.  I arrived at that conclusion when a potential HERS provider warned me (I guess they didn't want to support someone way up in Maine) if I varied more than 10% off of their QA results I would be placed on probation and possibly suspended.  The choice boils down to accuracy vs consistency.  Following the prescribed path to identify any insulation, measure its thickness and look up that r-value in a table keeps one out of trouble.  But I still refer to my surface temperature charts and yes, I'm often in trouble (different opinions at least).

I can find the instrument mentioned above if needed and I designed my own, but decided it would be too controversial to market.

Now, what did you have in mind?

Bud

I agree with you on the visual inspection and IR analysis. But every once in a while a customer asks what is the R rating of my Ceiling/Walls now. I perform rudimentary calculations and tell them what I can. But I really don't know what's in the walls or  even a vaulted ceiling. I found this site just yesterday and it will come in handy.

http://web.ornl.gov/sci/roofs+walls/AWT/InteractiveCalculators/rval... 

Best one I have found to date. I would imagine the surface temperature procedure requires the inside of the house to be unconditioned, or does it take into consideration the base temperature?? 

Thanks for the response. Tony

Here's another, easier, calculator: http://www.residentialenergydynamics.com/REDCalcFree/Tools/Infrared...

If you want to look fancy, and the tool has other uses, check this one out:  Testo 435 HVAC Performance Test Kits

The r/u value measurement requires this probe: http://www.aikencolon.com/Testo-PN-0614-1635-435-U-and-R-Value-Prob...

Here's a link for the meter: http://www.aikencolon.com/Testo-435-HVAC-Test-Kits_c_1158.html

Both of these approaches will require mother nature to cooperate with a delta T so the house needs to be conditioned.

Careful with the clay they use as it might stain the surface.  A painters tape might work instead.

If you have an IR camera you will find it makes a great impression and provides the temperature numbers required.  I agree, areas like a vaulted ceiling can be impossible to inspect and often subject to air flow affecting the performance value.  But, solar issues and radiant heat loss make temperature measurements questionable.  But still, it can help.

Bud

RSS

Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy,) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.

Latest Activity

Tom Conlon commented on Kurt Shafer's blog post What is your opinion about members promoting products here?
"I just checked the site Guidelines Kurt, and any true "promotions" should be posted in…"
14 hours ago
Tom Conlon posted a discussion

Whole House Fans - Love 'Em or Not?

I just searched this forum for "Whole House Fan", but I didn't find much about them (except …See More
14 hours ago
Richard Beyer replied to Mike Kandel's discussion Our Homes Suck – And That's Why Our Kids Have Sinus Problems
"Don, Thank you for the praise! I only wish that some of these profiteers could answer my questions…"
17 hours ago
Richard Beyer replied to Mike Kandel's discussion Our Homes Suck – And That's Why Our Kids Have Sinus Problems
"Todd, This report (attached link) below on poor people living in subsidized housing show's…"
17 hours ago
Mike Kandel added 4 discussions to the group Building Performance Institute (BPI)
19 hours ago
Mike Kandel posted discussions
19 hours ago
Nate Adams commented on Jim Gunshinan's blog post My Energy Upgrade California—The Numbers Are In
"Jim, Glad to help! OK, a touch of soap box. So long as we don't tell people EE is free and…"
19 hours ago
Kurt Shafer commented on Kurt Shafer's blog post What is your opinion about members promoting products here?
"Bob, Good idea. I see that you are a window energy reduction expert. You might consider adding…"
20 hours ago
Robert (Bob) Bacon commented on Kurt Shafer's blog post What is your opinion about members promoting products here?
"Kurt, I would explain what energy/efficiency problem this device solves and explain the science the…"
20 hours ago
Ben Jacobs replied to Mike Kandel's discussion Our Homes Suck – And That's Why Our Kids Have Sinus Problems
"I agree that in many homes the indoor air sucks.  However, a lot of this problem is caused…"
22 hours ago
Kurt Shafer commented on Kurt Shafer's blog post What is your opinion about members promoting products here?
"Tom, thank you for your odd reference to a leaky duck. It is a bit off topic since I was not asking…"
23 hours ago
Tom Delconte commented on Kurt Shafer's blog post What is your opinion about members promoting products here?
"Shameless self promotion here sucks like a leaky duck!"
yesterday

© 2014   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service