I am trying to quanitfy the energy savings that is generated by having clean furnace filters installed. the furnace filter manufacturers have good data regarding air quality but what does a dirty filter do to the performance of the furnace? 

Views: 287

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

To get the conversation going...

Let me start by saying I don't have a complete answer to your question but thought I would throw this out for discussion.

I welcome comments.

 

You can measure the performance difference of the blower between a system with a clean filter and a system with a dirty filter.The measurement will be precise for that one system given those specific filters at that point in time. But it would be hard to apply that to other systems. I don't know if that is of use to you. Also, that is only the blower. I have some thoughts on measuring the rest of the system but they are weak. See below.

 

In order to measure the blower performance you need some way of measuring the energy use of the system.

You could use an Amp meter (Fluke makes a good one) or an energy mgmt device like (e.g. TED  http://www.theenergydetective.com/).

Once you have the energy mgmt device in place, run the system* with the old filter and note the energy use.

Replace the filter and take a new measurement.

Subtracting those two measurements will give you the energy wasted due to the blower.

That should be pretty accurate.

I ran a similar test trying to determine the performance difference with a barometric bypass open vs closed. I ran this test because I suspected the bypass was setup incorrectly and eating to much energy. My test proved my theory with real data.

 

However, you still need to account for the energy wasted from the heating system.

I have no great ideas here but will suggest the following two ideas as a better than nothing solution. I have little confidence of the accuracy of either of these but it might be better than nothing for a ballpark number and it opens up the discussion.

 

1. Use a ratio of the good filter to bad filter energy use and the system rated efficiency to the "bad filter" efficiency.

ex. Blower used 1000 watts with good filter and 1200 watts with bad filter. Furnace is 95% efficient (per mfg).

good filter energy / Bad filter efficiency = good system efficiency /bad system efficiency (BSE)

1000w x 1200 w  = 95% x BSE   or BSE = 88%

 

2. Calculate the additional time that the system has to run due to the inefficiency. Then calculate the fuel cost of that additional time (based on mfg data).

If the system is moving 800 cfm with a clean filter and we calculate the blower is only about 83% efficient  (1000w/1200w), with a dirty filter then the system is pumping 664 cfm. To get the same total volume of air, the system with the dirty filter would need to run 20% more (664cfm x 120% = 800 cfm).

For calculation purposes, let's assume the cost to run the system is $1 per hr per mfg specs, and the system is running 10 hrs per day. It would thus cost an additional 2 hrs and thus $2 per day with the dirty filter.

 

Bonus option: Use both of the above methods and average them out.

 

Paul

RSS

Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy,) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.

Latest Activity

daniel manriquez replied to Trip's discussion Starting a Home Weatherization Business. Considering it...
"I would talk to Daniel Tait at http://www.nexusenergycenter.org/ . They do a lot of work with…"
41 minutes ago
Tom White's video was featured

Main St Nevada City, Historic Victorian energy upgrade story, Balance Point HP, Debra Little

Energy upgrade of historic 1866 Victorian by Gavin Healy & Dan Perunko of Balance Point Home Performance; Nevada City, CA. Extensive retrofit: attic, wall & ...
1 hour ago
Profile IconRamon Aguirre, John Kane, Bobby Hight and 3 more joined Home Energy Pros
3 hours ago
Jim Gunshinan commented on Jim Gunshinan's blog post My Energy Upgrade California—The Numbers Are In
"Thanks Nate for more good stuff to chew on—and nutritional! We may be running out to Home…"
12 hours ago
Tom Conlon commented on Jim Gunshinan's blog post My Energy Upgrade California—The Numbers Are In
"Jim,I just got around to re-reading your four-part series and I think this is a really interesting…"
12 hours ago
Nate Adams commented on Jim Gunshinan's blog post My Energy Upgrade California—The Numbers Are In
"$50 in health ain't much... not with my crappy high deductible plan. It buys half of a cold…"
12 hours ago
tedkidd commented on Jim Gunshinan's blog post My Energy Upgrade California—The Numbers Are In
"Yep, this thread has some good discussion. Back to dehumidification.  This may be…"
16 hours ago
Jim Gunshinan commented on Jim Gunshinan's blog post My Energy Upgrade California—The Numbers Are In
"Thanks for the clarification Nate. If I had the ability to precisely measure what $50 of health…"
18 hours ago
Nate Adams commented on Jim Gunshinan's blog post My Energy Upgrade California—The Numbers Are In
"Jim, Just a clarification, it's not DEhumidification I'm worried about in your climate,…"
18 hours ago
Chris McTaggart posted events
18 hours ago
Jim Gunshinan commented on Jim Gunshinan's blog post My Energy Upgrade California—The Numbers Are In
"Hi Nate, I'm glad this post has generated so much good discussion, since that is its main…"
18 hours ago
Diane Chojnowski's group was featured
Thumbnail

Facebook Pages

Does your company or organization have a Facebook Page?This group is for pros who have facebook…See More
18 hours ago

© 2014   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service