I am working on a 1950's colonial with attic insulation consisting of 2"x6" joists filled with loose fill fiberglass. The fiberglass is covered by 1" x 6" decking with 1/4" between the boards. I am recommending adding cellulose to improve the air barrier and insulate. My question is whether I can get away with not removing the old boards, or maybe removing every third one? How much area is needed to ensure moisture can dry to the outside? It should not get damp because of proper ventilation.
The upfront cost of retrofits is a big barrier to comprehensive weatherization. Anything I can do to reduce the cost of installation will help.
Thanks.

Views: 446

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Thanks for asking this question - I've actually been wondering the same thing for personal use. I hadn't thought of the every-third-board idea (seems a good thought), but was instead pondering how far sideways I could shoot sprayfoam (the decking doesn't extend to where the sloped roof gets very low). There's currently ~1" of ancient cellulose in my attic and I'm a total hypocrite for not doing anything about it in the year we've been in the house!

Also need to decide whether or not to shop-vac up the cellulose before sprayfoaming. Thoughts?

Best case is that you remove the boards and the existing insulation completely before doing air sealing--the loose FG has only marginal value, an inch of cellulose almost none. Ideally you are going to install 16-18" of insulation, so the boards will be buried and doing you no good anyway, in the long term.

 

Second best is to carefully move insulation aside so that you can still do a thorough job.

 

If there's a moisture issue, it's probably going to come from air leakage into the attic, not the presence of the boards, so the air sealing is critical. 

Just adding cellulose insulation will not improve your air barrier.  I would recommend removing the floor boards, spot air-sealing with foam (and rigid if necessary) at bypasses, etc. and installing new cellulose or FG.  I would not recommend replacing the boards unless you plan on raising the platform to accommodate adequate insulation.  I discourage attic storage --what's the R-value of a box of christmas ornaments or a suitcase crushing insulation near the platform?

 

Depending on the strength of the ceiling below and no can-lights, etc, you may be able to remove the existing insulation and dense-pack insulation below the boards from the ends or via drilled holes into or removal of certain boards.  You may not achieve enough thickness and I would still be concerned with air and moisture migration since it's not a truly enclosed cavity.

 

If the air barrier is good at the ceiling below (obviously with no can-lights), you could just add more insulation on top of everything.  Seal and bury the ducts as well.  Avoid or replace your knob-n-tube wiring!

This seems to come up often, especially when customers want to keep the floor boards in place for storage.  Best solution would be to remove floor boards, allowing for proper air sealing and achieve a minimum of R-38.  Another option is to remove some boards to air seal, then inject dense pack cellulose.  But, you will only get R-24.  Not so great, and the utilities may not grant you an exception.  Third option, inject foam into cavity (use injection foam and not spray foam). This will take care of air sealing, but again you only get R-30.  Option 3 can also present some IAQ issues.  If it comes into contact with any formaldehyde baring material, the formaldehyde will off-gas.  Injection foam on a flat surface can also warp the material on which it sits.  

 

So, remove the floor boards, do the job right and get rid of the old junk you are trying to store!  IMHO.

In order to do make a substantial difference in the air sealing of your home (this is possible!) you have got to be able to access the ceiling and do some caulking, foaming and rigid batting of air leaks.  While I feel for you and all the work it is going to take in order to remove boards and existing insulation, you will be far ahead by doing so.  My recommendation would be to visit the local temporary labor business in town and get a couple of people to help you for a day.  I imagine you could get some serious work done removing these hindrances in a solid day of work.  No one is going to go back to do air sealing once you have blown additional insulation in your attic.  What you decide now will be there for the next multiple decades.  Bite the bullet!

Your last two statements, "The upfront cost of retrofits is a big barrier to comprehensive weatherization. Anything I can do to reduce the cost of installation will help," are compelling. You need a solution that makes sense, given the conditions.

 

I'd pull up every third or fourth board, as well as the perimeter boards, install baffles, and blow it to r-38 or r-49, infilling where there are voids in the existing fiberglass.

 

Even then, pulling the boards from anywhere but the perimeter may be superfluous. You could blow 16" on top and make sure the ends at the baffles are well-filled. And if the customer insists on retaining some floor space, build a dam around a section and call it good.

 

This may only be an 80% solution, but it may make the difference between an upgrade sold and efficiency gain lost.

 

We need to consider the extent to which some of our austere approaches to home performance scares off our customers, and sends the public a message that our field is unapolegetically fixed and inflexible. We don't have enough credibility among the masses to take that kind of approach. Yet.

RSS

Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy,) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.

Latest Activity

Linda Wigington replied to Linda Wigington's discussion Low-cost electricity monitoring: Accuracy & Applications in the group 1000 Home Challenge
"Here is a response from Frank Bergamachi (Thousand Home Challenge project #4) I’ve looked…"
3 hours ago
Linda Wigington replied to Linda Wigington's discussion Low-cost electricity monitoring: Accuracy & Applications in the group 1000 Home Challenge
"Here is a response from Larry Kinney A few years ago someone had a gee whiz calibrated watt and…"
3 hours ago
Dale@EnergyWright replied to Linda Wigington's discussion Low-cost electricity monitoring: Accuracy & Applications in the group 1000 Home Challenge
"I've used the efergy Elite whole house energy monitor to evaluate 240V HPWHs. I found the…"
3 hours ago
Profile IconDale@EnergyWright and Maria Lacey joined David Eggleton's group
Thumbnail

1000 Home Challenge

Linda Wigington distinguished between deep retrofits & deep energy reductions, thus expanding…See More
4 hours ago
Profile IconAdam Swain, Cynthia Sandherr, James Skeldon and 2 more joined Home Energy Pros
4 hours ago
Tom White posted videos
13 hours ago
Maria Lacey replied to Linda Wigington's discussion Low-cost electricity monitoring: Accuracy & Applications in the group 1000 Home Challenge
"I attempted to use an AZTech device. I have used the Watt Stopper, Watts Up Pro, Kill-A-Watt…"
17 hours ago
Andy Li replied to David Parker's discussion Energy auditor equipment for sale- blower door, duct tester,combustion analyzer in the group Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase
"Is Minneapolis Duct Blaster still available? send some photos and how much do you ask for? my…"
22 hours ago

© 2014   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service