Does anyone else find the $300 membership fee a bit rich for a business consisting of only one self-employed owner?

At $100 I might consider it, but at $300 they've pretty much prevented me from affording it.

What has Efficiency First done for me that warrants $300/year membership? To date, not a thing. I find this fee to be quite exorbitant and as a result, I don't think I'm going to renew this year.

I've sent an email to info@efficiencyfirst.org asking them what justifies this cost, but haven't received any reply for 10 days now... Sealing the deal of no renewal.

Anyone else find this rate excessive?.

Tags: efficiency, first, membership, overpriced

Views: 103

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I do. We have to think efficiency first when we spend our hard earned dollars, and it.s not efficient to pay $300 a year for  a club membership. Don't let the dot org fool you this is a business whose main concern is profit, not education.I always get e-mails from them to "attend the latest webinar" $50 for nonmembers and approved for "x" credit hours from BPI. I also find it laughable that you get credit hours for marketing, sales etc. We should get credit for not paying for these bogus "continuing education credits" I gain valuable insight on our profession right here from seasoned veterans who know what their doing and explain things in a very straightforward and understandable manner. My hats off to Home Energy Pros website we share knowledge for free.

Here here for Home Energy Pros!

Incredibly excessive! So excessive, in fact, that it would cover 4 of my home electricity bills, perhaps 6 in the near future. Let's keep our our annual and monthly costs down so we can enjoy a movie out once in a while!

To be fair, after resending my original email, Coby from EF called almost immediately and left a message followed by an email with his take on the worth of the membership price. Apparently my first email fell between the cracks, no malice intended. Coby is and has always been a champion for that organization. I also need to be very clear that I'm not against the organization whatsoever, I simply have issue with the price of membership. Here is the response Coby sent:

 

Hi Rod,

Sure thing -- thanks for taking the time to put your thoughts in writing and follow up with us on this. I'll try to address the items you mention below about direct value pieces -- please let me know if you have any questions or would like to follow up on anything
 
Regarding discounts on diagnostic equipment (and other products and services): If you haven't already, you may want to take a look at our list of member benefits: http://www.efficiencyfirst.org/join/memberbenefits_preview/. Efficiency First members get discounts on products from a couple of diagnostic tools retailers (Energy Conservation INstitute and TruTechTools), as well as discounts on ACI conferences, home performance marketing services and other items. For some members, the discounts more than cover their membership fees, but of course it depends on the company, the types of products you purchase most, whether you attend ACI conferences, etc.

We don't currently offer discounts on business insurance (though we do offer a discount on first-year EGIA membership, which does offer a business discount). And we're constantly looking to add benefits that will be valuable for companies and help people's bottom line (so it's helpful to know that business insurance discounts are a priority for you).
 
Membership also includes our webinar series, which has been very popular with EF members. You can view the list of upcoming and past webinars here: http://www.efficiencyfirst.org/resources/. Many of our webinars also qualify for BPI CEUs (when they are viewed live), which can be a financial value for those looking for CEU opportunities.

One clarification -- Efficiency First membership dues are based on a company's gross annual revenue from home performance work, so companies with more employees do tend to pay more in membership dues (because they have more revenue). You can take a look at the dues structure here: http://www.efficiencyfirst.org/join/ (on the right-hand sidebar).
 
This list isn't static -- so we want to hear from you and others in the industry about the kinds of benefits and services that would provide value (financial and otherwise) back to you, in addition of course to the work we do on industry growth initiatives (even though those efforts don't always result in quick success).

Hopefully this helps answer some of your questions. I'm around today if you would like to follow up, then will be away from my desk tomorrow and back at the office mid-next week as well. Or feel free to call the main phone line (415-449-0551) if you would like to connect with someone while I'm out.

Thanks again,
 
Coby
_____________________
Efficiency First info@efficiencyfirst.org
main: (415) 449-0551
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Rod Fox a title="mailto:rod@amgi.net" href="mailto:rod@amgi.net" target="_blank">rod@amgi.net>wrote:
Hey Coby, thanks for the reply. I was away from my phone when you called, so sorry about that. And thanks for the personal reply as well.
Outside of a phone call, and outside of the normal canned responses about what Efficiency First does for the home performance industry, I'm specifically looking for an answer to how this $300 benefits me directly as a small business owner of an energy auditing and weatherization consulting business? I've had two years prior of membership and can't say I benefitted from it at all, even after working tirelessly on the GoldStar program with local NM politicians. That never came to fruition. I mean, if my membership were to get me a $300 discount on liability insurance with errors and omissions protection, I'd consider it. Or if I could get $300 off diagnostic equipment, that would be great too. But the offerings that EF has shown me in the past didn't add up to $300. So I ask again, how does this $300 benefit me directly? And why is it that a company of 12 can pay the $300 for all employess to be members, but a hard-working, struggling guy like myself has to pay the full $300? That doesn't add up...
 
Rod

RSS

Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy, under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.

Latest Activity

Mark Richardson added a discussion to the group Renewable Energy
Thumbnail

Disasters & sustainable energy

Read my response to J.C. Martel's discussion:…See More
13 hours ago
Mark Richardson replied to J.C. Martel's discussion Disasters & sustainable energy
"Hi All, Interesting topic - myriad issues in play here, but I’ll try to touch on the ones I…"
13 hours ago
Eric Kjelshus replied to Johnny Ritzo's discussion Selecting a Water Heater
"I have been using  Rheem or State or Brad/white PVC flued tank type hot water heater…"
yesterday
Bachi Brunato replied to Bachi Brunato's discussion Boxing and Insulating Around Non-ICAT Cans
"As it turns out, we have 10 Halo 99RT housings with Halo 998P Eyeball trim in the kitchen. The trim…"
yesterday
Bachi Brunato's discussion was featured

Boxing and Insulating Around Non-ICAT Cans

I have a client with 16) 4" halogen recessed light fixtures in the attic.I'd like to cover the cans…See More
yesterday
Johnny Ritzo's discussion was featured

Selecting a Water Heater

I am looking at updating the heating and water heating systems in a rental home I recently…See More
yesterday
George Kopf's discussion was featured

Misting Aeroseal in Pressurized Home = Amazing Air Sealing Innovation

As a training program manager for a non-profit, I am often too busy managing my program to catch…See More
yesterday
Tom Delconte's blog post was featured
yesterday
Christopher Morin's blog post was featured

Selling with Rebates: The Simple Payback

  The easiest way to show a homeowner how their investment in high-efficient equipment will help…See More
yesterday
Edward Foskey's blog post was featured
yesterday
Mike Rogers's blog post was featured

HOMES Act introduced with Bi-Partisan Sponsorship

We don't see a lot of bi-partisan bills in Congress these days. Here's one focusing on home…See More
yesterday
Mike Rogers posted a blog post

HOMES Act introduced with Bi-Partisan Sponsorship

We don't see a lot of bi-partisan bills in Congress these days. Here's one focusing on home…See More
yesterday

© 2013   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service