After running calculations on my furnace upgrade with inconclusive results I figure I would look at how much my AC upgrade really saved. yes my use was a LOT less in 2013 vs. 2012, but it was a lot cooler also.

Old AC: 1999 Carrier 12SEER 3 ton.

New AC: Thermalzone 14.5SEER 2 ton.

Same furnace with 3 ton drive used both years, blower switched from high to low speed when AC replaced at the end of summer 2012.

First the usage data:

Views: 145

Attachments:

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

2,000 CDD's @ 65f for 2013

2,430 CDD's @ 65f for 2012

2,700 CDD's @ 65f for 2011

Hi Bob,

Have you looked up your CDDs?  What base would you use and was the house set temp the same for all 3 years?  If you used a set back (up) then you will need to select a time related average number.

Electric use is even more difficult to sort out as to what went to AC and what would have been normal for the house, but there is still a baseline to be determined.  A quick guess would be to subtract 350 from every column.

You said "After running calculations on my furnace upgrade with inconclusive results"  actually, my take on that discussion was the results were conclusive, the new more efficient system used more energy than the older less efficient one it replaced.  The "why" question was what was inconclusive.

BTU per HDD or CDD is still a good indicator of direction and a reasonable indicator of magnitude.

Bud

My post got garbled somehow, wasn't able to edit the original post. CDD's for each year are listed in 2nd post. I was thinking on the lines of 500KWH as "base use" per month. We don't use our AC at all during the winter.

On the Furnace replacement I was thinking that too, until somebody mentioned that heat loss isn't linear to Delta T. No further calculations/formulas were provided. Wind Chills/Additional use by Water Heater are other variables.

My mistake, I work from a printout of the post and only printed the original post.  The CDD I pulled up vary a little from yours, not sure where is best to find them.  I used

http://www.degreedays.net/ and they have a good explanation on selecting the base number:

http://www.degreedays.net/regression-analysis

Lots more at that web site plus some posts and answers.

I limited the CDD to April through Oct. so it excluded a few and initially used a base of 75°.  Few people turn on their ac when it is 75° outside, but no one turns it on at 65°.

I simply used KWH per CDD for comparison. 

2011 = 3.1 kwh/cdd

2012 = 3.7       "

2013 = 3.0       "

I'm not sure what you expected, but 2013 doesn't look much better than 2011 based upon energy used per CDD.  I'll check the other base numbers but I don't expect much of a change.  I also used the 350 kwh offset as 500 seems way too high.  Electric use for other than ac actually goes down during the summer, less lighting, less water heating, less cooking inside, and so on.

As for the comment that heat loss is not linear with delta T, doesn't alter the relationship that they move in the same direction, the greater the ▲T the greater the heat loss.  Using HDD or CDD, short of hourly calculations, is still good for what you are comparing.

Bud

65f - 75f outdoor temps, we normally leave the windows open if humidity isn't too high. House is closed up between 55f-65f, with no heat running. Heat goes on below 55 outdoors. We leave the house closed up at night during the summer to prevent humidity build up, even when it's below 70. Internal gains and heat penetrating into the house from the days sun will cause the AC to run when it's 75 indoors/70 outdoors. In the morning the AC doesn't run much at 75/70.

For people who never open their windows, it isn't uncommon to run the AC at 70 degree outdoor temps. Yeah it's a waste to run AC when its a beautiful day outside, but that's another discussion..

Interesting that you mention more water heating/cooking use during winter. Both of those are gas in our house. Should I be factoring those into my winter base for DTh use? Lights are LED or CFL, so not much use there.

RSS

Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy,) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.

Latest Activity

Profile IconJean-Paul, Bryan and Erica Sullivan joined Home Energy Pros
48 minutes ago
tedkidd replied to Bob Blanchette's discussion How does Cycles Per Hour affect real world AFUE?
"Want to spot a simpleton? It's a guy who thinks EE and comfort are disconnected.  Want…"
50 minutes ago
tedkidd commented on Tom White's blog post Clean Energy Works Oregon: Total Home Performance
"Nice post Tom! I really like how he puts that. Leveraging interests so they can optimize…"
58 minutes ago
Kent Mitchell commented on Tom White's blog post Clean Energy Works Oregon: Total Home Performance
"As a contractor in the region - we frequently wonder how/why you can be a non-profit?  Oregon…"
2 hours ago
Craig Foley posted a status
"Support the SAVE Act. Legislation would add energy costs to underwriting process. NJ article at: http://goo.gl/f57iGC"
2 hours ago
Bud Poll posted a discussion

Basing air exchange on house volume??

I have long objected to including a basement volume when calculating air exchange as it just…See More
2 hours ago
Tom White's video was featured

Twas The Night Before a Clean Energy Christmas

From the foothills of the Rockies, RMI editorial director Pete Bronski reads 'Twas The Night Before a Clean Energy Christmas. Happy Holidays and Happy New Year!
4 hours ago
Tom White's blog post was featured

Clean Energy Works Oregon: Total Home Performance

Clean Energy Works Oregon (CEWO) is the largest nonprofit home performance provider in Oregon,…See More
4 hours ago

© 2014   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service