Hey all,

We recently hired a new tech that has previously done a bunch of Home Performance work on the East coast and he has turned me on to a new idea on how to insulate a basement rim joist that is enclosed with a ceiling. I wanted to see what everyone thinks about dense pack cellulose in an enclosed rim joist.

It makes sense that when you have a joist running parallel to the foundation wall that you can drill a hole in the ceiling and fill the joist cavity that is up against the rim. But for the side of the basement that has a wall perpendicular to the joists, can this work?

I have not heard about any contractors here in Portland OR using this technique, but in my mind it seems possible. I just wanted to make sure before we do the install, that it will pass program QC. Before I present it to the program, I wanted to hear some opinions from people that have experience  using this method.

So here's how I see it. If you drill the hole about 2 -3 feet away from the rim joist (towards the inside of the basement) in the basement ceiling, and blow material into the cavity, you should be able to make sure that the rim is fully insulated. I can imagine that the material would taper towards the hole, but as long as you pack it in, it would be fine.

Thanks!

Views: 2006

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Other approved materials are allowed only in section 4 of R302.11 (above), for around mechanical penetrations, not for draftstopping or firestopping in concealed frame cavities.

I was referring to the concealed cavities where codes have required nominal 2" lumber, and where dense-pack cellulose can meet or exceed the same standard.

 

R302.11.1 Fireblocking materials.

Except as provided in Section R302.11, Item 4, fireblocking shall consist of the following materials.

    1. Two-inch (51 mm) nominal lumber.

    2. Two thicknesses of 1-inch (25.4 mm) nominal lumber with broken lap joints.

    3. One thickness of 23/32-inch (18.3 mm) wood structural panels with joints backed by 23/32-inch (18.3 mm) wood structural panels.

    4. One thickness of 3/4-inch (19.1 mm) particleboard with joints backed by 3/4-inch (19.1 mm) particleboard.

    5. One-half-inch (12.7 mm) gypsum board.

    6. One-quarter-inch (6.4 mm) cement-based millboard.

    7. Batts or blankets of mineral wool or glass fiber or other approved materials installed in such a manner as to be securely retained in place.

    8. Cellulose insulation installed as tested for the specific application.

It would be great if someone did a video and u-tubed it.

 

Practically speaking, we seal all holes less than about 2' with foam.  1/2" OSB does the rest.  We foam gypsum common wall gaps at framing, gaps between double walls, and most items.  Average house will have 3-4 places where a piece of wood is used.  

Then you're not complying with code.

In what way are we not complying with the code?
In what way are we not complying with the code?
In what way are we not complying with the code?

See R302.11.1 above.

can you be specific - I am not seeing it

"we seal all holes less than about 2' with foam.  1/2" OSB does the rest"

How is that consistent with the very specific list of allowed fireblocking materials?

And, did you mean holes less than 2 feet? Even if you meant 2 inches, that still exceeds what you reported as the maximum span for foam: not span more than 1-5/16"

Something is screwy with the site tonight

We use OSB to cover the edges of things like soffits then seal with foam, and use extruded styrofoam to seal the tops for energy,  We use the foam to cover the backs of kneewalls, and use it to fabricate top and bottom plates as necessary,  No one says anything at 2" even though the es says 1-5/16 - as they realize what the material is.  We will do this as we seal over 2500 new houses in 2012 in, as I said, 500 jurisdictions (New Jersey has a jurisdiction every couple of miles)

We have excellent working relationships with most of the inspectors that we deal with.  Based on this experience, I have no qualms about using this same system in existing houses, even though the code does not apply for the level of work we are usually doing in retrofits.

Wow thanks for all the advice! I think this is enough info to prove that this is a valid strategy.

RSS

Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy,) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.

Latest Activity

Bud Poll replied to Bud Poll's discussion CO poisoning in Yarmouth Maine
"Hi Chad, I sure would like to hear the follow-up on what caused the CO issue down there.  As…"
23 minutes ago
Chad Mcaulife replied to Bud Poll's discussion CO poisoning in Yarmouth Maine
"I got a call yesterday from a homeowner who had a direct vent furnace installed a year ago and she…"
46 minutes ago
Windzer Pierre-Louis replied to Matthew P's discussion Needed: Gas Detector and CO Detector. What do you recommend?
"Matt, I am new to the industry, less than 6 months. I love the mission of the industry; to bring…"
1 hour ago
Todd Collins replied to Nate Adams's discussion One Knob and the Pain That Inspired It
"Home performance is about comfort and energy savings.  We are working on a document about…"
1 hour ago
tedkidd commented on Shawna Henderson's blog post Sales funnels are funny shaped things
"Nice Venn Diagram. Product sales vs Consultative Solutions sales. We like the Sandler Selling…"
1 hour ago
Andrew Aliferis replied to Patrick Michaelyan's discussion Proper means to "plug" flue pipes after testing gas appliances.
"Patrick, These are what works for the programs I am involved in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. They…"
2 hours ago
Profile IconTravis Thom and Amita Singh joined Home Energy Pros
3 hours ago
Shawna Henderson's blog post was featured

Sales funnels are funny shaped things

One challenge seems to be at the forefront of a lot of the discussions I'm having with colleagues…See More
3 hours ago

© 2015   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service