Hello Pros.

I have been reading up on the use of closed-cell foam applied to brick (foundation) walls.

I live and do business in northern Virginia, where we have a heating dominated climate with hot and humid summers.

I had no concerns spraying foundation walls of basements and crawl spaces with closed-cell foam (typically 2") until I was asked about whether brick walls can actually be compromised by spraying them with closed-cell foam.

I understand building science, and therefore why I have become a huge proponent of closed-cell over open-cell foam.

So, if I spray 2" to the brick walls in a crawl space in Washington DC am I doing the right thing, or am I introducing a structural issue? I was going to spray the brick walls of a tight crawl space, as well as the rim\band joist areas, after laying down a 12 mil vapor barrier (sealing the seams and running the vapor barrier up the walls a few inches).

Thanks in advance.

Patrick

Views: 242

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Check out http://www.buildingscience.com/documents/insights/bsi-011-capillari... & they did have one other on spalling for spraying above grade walls. If worried maybe consider using Delta Dry on walls & then spraying???

6 to 8 inches as I recall is minimum not just a few inches

Thanks Sean.

Here in central Vermont, we see houses from the 1800s with brick walls as part of the foundation, but the brick is not structural. Large slabs of granite are holding up the typical 8x8 sill beam. If we were to spray SPF (Spray Polyurethane Foam) on the brick, we are usually not air sealing, due to the large cavity between the granite and brick. In the rare house where there is only brick (typically a double-wythe wall) supporting the sill beam, the brick is in poor condition from being subjected to high moisture from the basement or crawl space, as well as moisture from the exterior weather. In my opinion, if it is structural brick, and if it has been subjected to a chronically damp crawl space, then the brick is not drying to the interior anyway, so I would be less concerned about SPF on the interior IF the brick is in good condition. A minimum of 2" of closed cell SPF would meet the requirements for the DC area. Much more than that would be a waste, unless you are going to also insulate the floor of the crawl space. 

Thank you Brad, that is very helpful.

RSS

Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy,) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.

Latest Activity

Kevin Jordan shared a profile on Facebook
14 minutes ago
Profile IconKimberly Loewen, Bob Whelan, Russ Pittis and 1 more joined Home Energy Pros
1 hour ago
Kari Sauder replied to James White's discussion What happened to Home Energy Pro's website?
"I stopped using Firefox -- too many glitches"
3 hours ago
Tom Mallard replied to Hal Skinner's discussion How our ceramic based RCC works in the group Radiant Control Coatings
"So it seems that what you're saying is for heat-transfer the stuff has little resistance or…"
12 hours ago
Mike Kandel posted a discussion

Earn BPI CEUs at 3rd Annual Building Performance Forum

If you're searching for BPI CEUs, you'll find plenty at the 3rd Annual Building Performance Forum…See More
18 hours ago
Mike Kandel added a discussion to the group Building Performance Institute (BPI)
Thumbnail

Earn BPI CEUs at 3rd Annual Building Performance Forum

If you're searching for BPI CEUs, you'll find plenty at the 3rd Annual Building Performance Forum…See More
18 hours ago
Sean Lintow Sr commented on Christopher Morin's blog post UPDATED: Big Changes for Duct Testing in MA
"4% TOTAL Ted - Leakage to outside was stripped from the codes & for good reason"
21 hours ago
tedkidd commented on Christopher Morin's blog post UPDATED: Big Changes for Duct Testing in MA
"Wait!  4% total leakage or 4% leakage to outdoors? "
22 hours ago

© 2014   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service