Hello Pros.

I have been reading up on the use of closed-cell foam applied to brick (foundation) walls.

I live and do business in northern Virginia, where we have a heating dominated climate with hot and humid summers.

I had no concerns spraying foundation walls of basements and crawl spaces with closed-cell foam (typically 2") until I was asked about whether brick walls can actually be compromised by spraying them with closed-cell foam.

I understand building science, and therefore why I have become a huge proponent of closed-cell over open-cell foam.

So, if I spray 2" to the brick walls in a crawl space in Washington DC am I doing the right thing, or am I introducing a structural issue? I was going to spray the brick walls of a tight crawl space, as well as the rim\band joist areas, after laying down a 12 mil vapor barrier (sealing the seams and running the vapor barrier up the walls a few inches).

Thanks in advance.

Patrick

Views: 895

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Check out http://www.buildingscience.com/documents/insights/bsi-011-capillari... & they did have one other on spalling for spraying above grade walls. If worried maybe consider using Delta Dry on walls & then spraying???

6 to 8 inches as I recall is minimum not just a few inches

Thanks Sean.

Here in central Vermont, we see houses from the 1800s with brick walls as part of the foundation, but the brick is not structural. Large slabs of granite are holding up the typical 8x8 sill beam. If we were to spray SPF (Spray Polyurethane Foam) on the brick, we are usually not air sealing, due to the large cavity between the granite and brick. In the rare house where there is only brick (typically a double-wythe wall) supporting the sill beam, the brick is in poor condition from being subjected to high moisture from the basement or crawl space, as well as moisture from the exterior weather. In my opinion, if it is structural brick, and if it has been subjected to a chronically damp crawl space, then the brick is not drying to the interior anyway, so I would be less concerned about SPF on the interior IF the brick is in good condition. A minimum of 2" of closed cell SPF would meet the requirements for the DC area. Much more than that would be a waste, unless you are going to also insulate the floor of the crawl space. 

Thank you Brad, that is very helpful.

RSS

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Twitter

Latest Activity

tedkidd liked Luis Hernandez's discussion Airsealing an old basement ceiling
1 hour ago
Ryan T De La Rosa posted a blog post

The Clean Power Plan and What You Can Do

Last month, Jessica Hardcastle at Environment Leader described an especially non-polarizing…See More
3 hours ago
Ed Minch replied to Luis Hernandez's discussion Airsealing an old basement ceiling
"Luis Think of it as a part of the house that is not being used, but part of the house none the…"
7 hours ago
Luis Hernandez replied to Luis Hernandez's discussion Searching for a multifamily study book in the group Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase
"Hey Craig!  Well, let's get serious and keep asking all our friends in the Home…"
8 hours ago
Luis Hernandez replied to Luis Hernandez's discussion Airsealing an old basement ceiling
"Hey there Ed,      I appreciate you comments... this is an interesting case because…"
8 hours ago
tedkidd replied to Luis Hernandez's discussion Airsealing an old basement ceiling
"bit.ly/ESHPhabitat1 our habitat project -mostly dirt floor..."
10 hours ago
Bryan Gabriel replied to Luis Hernandez's discussion Airsealing an old basement ceiling
"Luis, thanks for being open to sharing your experiences and photos of your project. What is the…"
10 hours ago
Craig McManus replied to Craig McManus's discussion Inventions that save energy, licensing to a US manufacturer?
"Yes happily."
12 hours ago

© 2016   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service