Would you hire someone to work in clients homes who have a criminal background? With the change in BPI criteria (no background check) This raises a very good question. If you hired someone with a criminal background and there was an issue at a clients house, would you the employer have exposure to a lawsuit because you sent someone into that residence and you had prior knowledge of their record?

Views: 273

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

       Personally, I have turned away many potential employees, who may have changed the tide of thier life, but still maintained past criminal histories.  I wish them well in thier search, but they are not the perfect fit for my ideals.  The last thing that I want to worry about is if my employee has sticky fingers at my clients home.

       We as a BPI community (and that is what we are talking) are not the average contractor, we have chosen to adopt these exceptional standards that set us apart from others, those companies with sticky fingered employees.  That said, morally, we are obligated to live to that exceptional standard, and to ensure that those that represent us do so also. 

       When a customer meets a bad employee, they evaluate the company by that employee.  WE ARE ONLY AS GOOD AS THE WORST EMPLOYEE WE HIRE!!!! 

       I am the coach of my team, I want to choose who plays for me, and who doesn't.  I want to decide how they will fit into my team, what position they will play.  I don't need an outside agency telling me the charateristics of my desired employee.  There is a reason why my company is BPI.  WE ARE BETTER THAN THE REST, and thats the employee I am looking for. 

       AS for the question, after all of the above is said, "YES ONE WOULD LIKELY ASSUME SOME LIABLITY, FOR KNOWING AND STILL EMPLOYING ONE WITH A DIRTY PAST."  From a Client's viewpoint, and likely his lawyers, "I went with a BPI certified contractor, because they are exceptional contractors, but this bonehead came in and......"

I would not hire people with a criminal background. But that is my choice as an employer. I think BPI was right to remove this requirement from the new standards. Same goes for drug testing. I fully support random testing and a drug free workplace. But I think that is an issue that should be left to the discretion of management. 

That said, there is nothing wrong with BPI conducting member surveys and publishing the results.

In short - YES dependent on what the criminal charge was

Besides with as wacked out as our legal system has gotten, it isn't too hard for one to end up with a "criminal record" without having done anything wrong

 

 

Thanks for your comments. On behalf of BPI, I would like to provide some additional historical context here. Our announcement regarding criminal background checks represents no change in our current policy. BPI has never conducted criminal background checks for any of its certifications. Nor does BPI have any knowledge of any certifying body in the contracting trades conducting criminal background checks.  This has never been a prerequisite for taking an exam and earning a credential. Rather, it has always been the responsibility of the employer.

 

BPI’s announcement relates only to our pilot program for our four new Home Energy Professional certifications. For this pilot, the volunteer Certification Scheme Committee recommended prerequisite criteria –including the criminal background check–  that it felt were appropriate to meet ISO 17024 accreditation of these certifications. Since then BPI has received numerous comments explaining why the criminal background check should remain the responsibility of the employer, not the certifying body. Thus, in accordance with ISO 17024 protocols that require BPI to incorporate industry feedback, BPI has removed this requirement from the prerequisite criteria for the pilot program. I hope this helps clarify our announcement.

RSS

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Twitter

Latest Activity

Rosie Smith replied to edward knight's discussion Minneapolis duct blaster for sale in the group Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase
"Hi Edward...is this equipment still available?? Thanks, Rosie Smith Fresno,…"
yesterday
Rosie Smith joined allen p tanner's group
Thumbnail

Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase

Discuss the pros and cons of the equipment you are interested in prior to purchase. Post equipment…See More
yesterday
Jim Gunshinan liked Tom White's discussion Home Energy Reader Survey
yesterday
Tom White posted a discussion

Home Energy Reader Survey

Home Energy wants to serve you better.  Please …See More
Monday
George Matthews's event was featured

Proof is Possible Tour by the Home Performance Workshop at Truitt and White Lumber Conference Room

October 7, 2016 from 9am to 1pm
Building Energy Performance Testing is sponsoring the Proof is Possible Tour to come to the San…See More
Monday
Profile IconAshley Noreuil, Fred Smith and Peter Moncada joined Home Energy Pros
Monday
George Matthews commented on George Matthews's event Proof is Possible Tour by the Home Performance Workshop
"Here is the flyer for the Advanced Techniques and Tools in Home Performance Friday October 7th at…"
Sunday
George Matthews posted an event

Proof is Possible Tour by the Home Performance Workshop at Truitt and White Lumber Conference Room

October 7, 2016 from 9am to 1pm
Building Energy Performance Testing is sponsoring the Proof is Possible Tour to come to the San…See More
Sunday

© 2016   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service