Are Reverse Osmosis water systems actually eco-friendly?

Let me start by saying that my reverse osmosis water system is great. I have had it for several years. It seems to be top-shelf for purifying water by removing lead, rust, etc.. The water is pure with no odors and the cost was under $200. We use it everyday and I recommend them. However, there is one major concern I have: It uses 3 gallons of water to produce 1 gallon of pure water. Does the extra 2 gallons used to make 1 gallon make it NON eco-friendly? What's your opinion?

Views: 1381

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Depends, where are those other two gallons going? If it is going down the drain, than the answer would be a general no, but do we blame that on the unit or just how we install them normally?

As a side note - no argument on the systems being great, producing clean water & recomending them when water quaity is an issue or an individual requires might have health issues    

Sean,

Thanks for your input.

Unfortunately, yes, the 2 gallons do go down the drain which results in energy consumption to pump it back though the treatment facility and back again. And, yes, we blame it on the unit, that's just the normal average of properly functioning units.(nothing to do with installation). It's a gray area. Perhaps it's just a fact that people choosing high quality healthy water purification systems cause some extra energy consumption (which causes carbon emissions). Maybe someday they will make it a gallon/in and gallon/out ratio.

There is one way that you could make it work and that would be if you were to attach a tank that would recirculate the water rather than dumping it or at least re-capture the water to be used for other purposes than drinking.  Water is not an issue here in the NE but all we have to do is to read the news and other people are praying for rain...

The waste water could not be recirculated back to the input of the purification system, but it could be used for other purposes. The 2 gallons of waste water contains the ions that were originally in the one gallon of de-ionized water.

Is this RODI system used only for drinking water, or for all household water?

Our household uses a filter mounted under the kitchen sink for drinking/cooking water, which we draw from a dedicated tap. The tap water supplied by our local water district contains no alarming levels of toxins such as lead, and since we replaced most of the old iron pipes in the house, rust has not been a problem anymore. Filtration should be fairly low energy cost, given that the filter is only replaced annually, and uses no excess water. What level of purification is needed depends on the local water supply.

My RO system is awesome and I super happy to be enjoying tasteless (Was poor tasting) water, and not purchasing disposable plastic bottles. The RO system I have does not waste any water, yup ZERO WASTE. Instead it pumps the heavier concentrated water into the hot water pipe. The system I purchased from ebay came with the pump and pressure switch for systems like wells where they have low pressure. All it took was one phone call to Watts Premier and they set me up with the solenoid needed and the check valve. Installation was easy and only required some valve changes to allow the RO lines on both sides, hot and cold water lines. The drain line into the sink is not used, but since I did mine on a fresh install I never made a hole there. It could be plugged, and they in fact sell a plug, or if you buy the kit it comes with the plug.

 

There are some requirements. The hot water heater must use a tank, not tankless, and it must be at least 25' from the RO system. For most unless you have a gravity feed heat pump system or a pump mounted on the hot water side, will turn the hot water on and run it for a minute to bring the hot water to the sink for washing dishes. Either way the unused RO water is living a second life. Insulating the hot water pipes and putting a pump inline with the hot water with a switch at each faucet that triggers the pump to run long enough to circulate the hot water, would be very green. Water is going to be a huge environmental issue moving forward. Being able to have hot water as soon as we open the faucet creates much less waste.

 

http://www.amazon.com/Watts-Premier-501026-Reverse-Retrofit/dp/B000...

RSS

Groups

Latest Activity

Efficiency First California posted a blog post
1 hour ago
Lindsay Bachman is now a member of Home Energy Pros
3 hours ago
Alfie Davis posted a blog post
Tuesday
Profile IconSam Compton, Cameron Home Insulation, Seth Shoneman and 2 more joined Home Energy Pros
Monday
Home Energy Magazine's blog post was featured
Monday
Eric Kjelshus replied to Gregory Cisco's discussion Abandoning under-slab HVAC ductwork which fills with groundwater seasonally.
"In Kansas City a lot of "cardboard" for supply was used in slab on grade.  1950-1970…"
Friday
Richard L. Rue replied to Sonja Persram's discussion Energy Savings Guarantee for single family dwellings in cold climate??
"Try EnergyWise Structures (www.energywisestructures.com) They are a NASA spin-off company that has…"
Sep 15
Debra Little commented on Home Energy Magazine's blog post NREL Research Finds That 22% of New Homes Completed in the U.S. in 2016 Were HERS Rated
"The avg scores are interesting. Are there comparative numbers for previous years? I thought they…"
Sep 15

Photos

Loading…
  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2017   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service