Are Energy Pros the OB-GYNs of the Real Estate Industry?

I was just looking over ACCA's new revised standard out for comment:

Existing Homes Evaluation and Performance Improvement - ANSI/ACCA 1...

I often try to imagine this industry at scale. When I do I begin to worry about how much liability these earnest new professionals are taking on -- especially in contrast to contractors and/or other pros  they may follow behind -- specifically those held to much narrower scope standards such as ACCA 4 (HVAC Maintenance), ACCA 5 (Quality HVAC Installation), licensed brokers, home inspectors, etc.

 With such broadly defined responsibilities, will their rates of malpractice (and associated insurance costs) eventually be higher?

 Two easily overlooked things that sound potentially expensive to me are the requirements to:

  1. Identify "any exterior or interior moisture issues", and
  2. Inspect the pool and note "type of suction outlet cover(s) and flow rating".

Please don't misunderstand me. Malpractice in any profession is always ugly, and I'm not defending it for a minute. But this is still a fragile new industry.

Are we positioning energy pros to be the future risk-magnet ob-gyns of the real estate industry?

Sure, others may want to shift liability to someone else, but do we really want to do this to ourselves?

If anybody has talked these issues over with their attorney or their insurance underwriter, or has any experience defending a claim, I'd be eager to hear your thoughts... either online here, or offline (in confidence).

 

PS - I'd love to be told I'm wrong about this.

Views: 377

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Even though checking for those items were may not have been on the previous check list.  An aggressive lawyer and a disgruntled customer could have still made a case that you should be checking for them - obvious safety and energy related items.   All it would take is the plaintiff's lawyer to track down a  couple of good expert witnesses that always check and you would be toast.

Documenting as part of the new standard - is an easy way to remind users to check.   They've added it to protect the industry as well as themselves.  

Professional errors and omission liability insurance is always a good idea,  the insurance companies like it when you adopt and follow standards such as the proposed ACCA revision.

As for the insurance climbing higher -- perhaps,  but rate of premium growth is also dependent on the other members of the profession,  if many choose to ignore the checks - they are sued - premiums for everyone will go up.  If members self police and keep training requirements up  - premiums will match the risk.

I'll take flak on this from other architects

but

Architects have been dealing with errors and omissions a very long time, some say a couple of thousand years.  At the least, now a days we have legally mandated PERSONAL liability that cannot be escaped by declaring bankruptcy.

now

The way I see it, part of the reason architects have less and less input into the construction process, has been a well intentioned but ultimately misguided attempt to limit risk.  In retrospect what we should have been doing for the last 50 yrs or so is lobby for limiting liability, limiting the ability of courts to broaden architects liability, up to and including finding architects insurers liable, not due to negligence, but merely because all the contractors, clients, and investors filed bankruptcy, as they often do in times of trouble, and someone has to pay the victims when a building fails.  I kid you not, that's from a lawyer, albeit about 15 yrs ago.  You do not want the energy industry to go the same way.

I'd suggest

All the industry groups needs to band together, create a STRONG national association of some sort, if only for legislative purposes, and lobby at the highest levels for comprehensive for reasonable limits to liability.  Many businesses have their liability limited to the charge for services or product.  Such as the software industry.  How do you think they got that protection?  They lobbied at the Ffederal level.

What to do until then?

I'd embrace those checkilists, including a version for the client.

Equate items to the fees you charge.

For example:  Is building moisture a BIG issue, does it require more time and effort, and experience, to address adequately.  You bet!.  Educate your client about it's importance, about it's complexity, and why the dollar number next to that item on the checklist will give you the time, help, equipment, etc. you need to protect them.

I hate to give away a good idea, but, check out my website RoughDesigns for a You Tube video that could well become your "Moisture Services" ad, it's the EIFS video under the "Architects and You Tube" button.

Please don't let us be the Proctologists.
Please.

LOL Corbett, Actually, I believe it's the insurance investigators and attorneys who usually say "bend over".

Thanks to all who responded.

RSS

Featured Forum Discussions

Too many BTU's. Too much horsepower?

Started by Steve in General Forum. Last reply by Walter Ahlgrim 3 hours ago. 3 Replies

Stack/wind pressure and flow networks.

Started by Daniel James Grundy in Training. Last reply by Daniel James Grundy 8 hours ago. 5 Replies

BDT with vermiculite in hollow CMU walls?

Started by Brad Cook in General Forum. Last reply by John Nicholas 13 hours ago. 2 Replies

Strange IR Image

Started by Larry Nissman in General Forum. Last reply by Brad Cook Mar 9. 7 Replies

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Latest Activity

Walter Ahlgrim replied to Steve's discussion Too many BTU's. Too much horsepower?
"The 5 ton system you have is not 500 hp racecar engines they are 500 hp truck engines. The duct…"
3 hours ago
Daniel James Grundy replied to Daniel James Grundy's discussion Stack/wind pressure and flow networks.
"So I wanted to start with a basic who can help then go into more detail later. But yes find…"
8 hours ago
Daniel James Grundy replied to Daniel James Grundy's discussion Stack/wind pressure and flow networks.
"My tutor got back to me and while areas don't quite feel right a little to much assumptions…"
8 hours ago
Brennan Less replied to Daniel James Grundy's discussion Stack/wind pressure and flow networks.
"Daniel, I'm assuming you're trying to predict the airflows through the different openings…"
9 hours ago
Martin Newmark joined allen p tanner's group
Thumbnail

Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase

Discuss the pros and cons of the equipment you are interested in prior to purchase. Post equipment…See More
11 hours ago
John Nicholas replied to Brad Cook's discussion BDT with vermiculite in hollow CMU walls?
"If the drywall is in good shape, you should have little worries about the 50pa depressurization…"
13 hours ago
tedkidd replied to Steve's discussion Too many BTU's. Too much horsepower?
"Does the house ever feel clammy? Do you have to keep the thermostat below 74 to be comfortable? Is…"
16 hours ago
Danielle Sass Byrnett liked Diane Chojnowski's blog post Don MacOdrum receives BPI's 2017 Tony Woods Award!
16 hours ago

Home Energy Pros

Welcome to Home Energy Pros – the unique digital community by and for those who work in the home energy performance arena.

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (supported by the U.S. Department of Energy) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.  Home Energy Pros is sponsored by the Better Buildings Residential Network. Please honor our Guidelines

© 2017   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service