# Another Window Question

We all know windows are cold in winter and do a poor job of keeping the heat in.  Unfortunately, the calculations that show the potential savings for new windows are dismal, with an extremely long payback period.

We are also aware that all too often an audit will over estimate the potential saving, all be it, for many reasons.  Well, my window question is, are we adding to this problem by over stating the initial heat loss through those windows?

I'm sure whole house heat loss calculations have been verified against actual energy bills, but that is essentially averaging the highs against the lows.  If we look at just the windows and apply the typical heat loss calculation along with the typical HDD, we are assuming an inside temp of 70° (base 65°).  But those windows are actually much colder, thus, the actual heat flowing through them is much less.  To add insult to this over estimate of heat loss, once the new windows are installed the surface temp increases.  Now our over stated savings for new windows shrinks as the new higher surface temp actually increases the delta T.  Despite modestly increasing the r-value of the window we now lose a portion to the increased temperature drive.  That take back actually occurs throughout the house anywhere insulation levels have been increased.

The bottom line is, we over estimate the heat loss from our windows from the start and then the window temps increase to steal a significant portion of our savings.  R-value goes up 50% while the delta T increases (just guessing) 25%, that would be significant.

The numbers are just a guess of course, but they illustrate the race condition between improving the r-value while increasing the temperature drive.  But surface temps of windows during cold spells can easily drop to 40° or lower while our calculations are still using 70°.

Bud

Tags: Window, heat, loss

Views: 96

### Replies to This Discussion

Here are some numbers.  I will post the related math if someone is interested.

18 windows in my 7500 HDD climate, U= 0.5 and total area = 180 ft²

The typical calculated heat loss would be 16.2 mmbtus (million BTU's).

Replace those windows with U= 0.25 windows and the heat loss is cut in half to 8.1 mmbtus with an apparent savings of 8.1 mmbtus.

However, the initial heat loss was never that high.  From this link, https://www.energyguide.com/info/window2.asp , at 0° outside we should expect an inside surface temp of about 44° on a simple double pane unit and 56° on a more high tech unit.

Factoring in the lower surface temp on the simple double pane window it would cut the heat loss approximately in half.  Therefore, the initial heat loss est should have been 8.1 mmbtus.  Now recalculating with the new windows but allowing for the increase in surface temp, the new heat loss becomes about 5.9 mmbtus.  Thus the savings are closer to 2.2 mmbtus and not the 8.1 mmbtus typically estimated.

Ouch! Those windows that were hard to justify on a savings basis just became impossible.  Comfort, yes. but payback will take a very long time.

This take back due to changes in surface temp occurs throughout the house as we improve the insulation.  It will take a sharper pencil than mine, but it does account for part of the shortfall when projected savings do not meet expectations.

Bud

## Home Energy Pros

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy,) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.

## Latest Activity

Tom White posted a video

### Passive House Revolution - Film Trailer

Looking for energy-efficiency in buildings? There's no need to wait for new technology - Passive House buildings use 80-90% less heating and cooling energy—a...
4 hours ago
Patrick Michaelyan's discussion was featured

### Rigid Foam (Polyiso) as a Weather-Resistive Barrier

Hello pros!I have done much reading on the subject and am still in need of a final round of…See More
4 hours ago
Mike Rogers's discussion was featured

### Where do you fall in the "staged" versus "gotta be all at once" discussion?

In several industry conversations over the past few months, there’s been debate about whether we…See More
4 hours ago
Bud Poll's discussion was featured

### I say to-may-toes and you say to-mah-toes

I like that song but I'm showing my age.We often talk about the general public's need to be…See More
4 hours ago
Ethan Bodnaruk's discussion was featured

### Insulating with *Updated* (an oxymoron, right!) knob and tube wiring

Hi everyone,I live in New York State and haven't been able to find good information on whether or…See More
4 hours ago
Craig McManus's discussion was featured

### How to keep mice, critters from getting into duct insulation that is under a house that is on piers.

How do you keep mice, critters from getting into duct insulation that is under a house that is on…See More
4 hours ago
Anthony J Passannante's discussion was featured

### Field Testing of R values

Is there equipment available or testing methodology for calculating the R values of walls and…See More
4 hours ago
David Byrnes's blog post was featured

### What Is the X-Factor In Hiring In Home Performance

An article published in the NY Times, titled, "How To Get A Job At Google" got me thinking about…See More
4 hours ago
Cameron Millard's blog post was featured

### 90% AFUE Wall Mount Furnace

I run an energy program in the mountains of Colorado. We have a lot of homes without existing duct…See More
4 hours ago
Stephanie@SaveOnEnergy's blog post was featured

### New Boston Homes Generate More Energy Than They Consume

In 2013, Boston earned the title of the most energy-efficient city in the United States from the…See More
4 hours ago
Melissa Ulbricht's blog post was featured

### How to Help Appraisers Fairly Value Home Energy Efficiency Improvements

4 hours ago
"When tell a customer it is time to consider a replacement, it is usually something running under…"
7 hours ago

© 2014   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.