Can anyone share their experience with air sampling of low pressure 2 part foam in residential homes? I'm about 20 hours into reading endless amounts of information relating to the hazards and need help  Anybody had any experience with OSHA or PELS of typical retrofits?

Views: 344

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Cory, we have tried badges to detect airborne isocyanates.  The ones we tried were not sufficiently sensitive to detect the components in the low pressure foam we were using.

 

We also have talked with our foam manufacturer and with our respirator cartridge supplier.  We concluded that the best way to minimize the risks of long term exposure is to use positive pressure, outdoor supplied air respirators rather than the dual cartridge respirators.  Also, good engineering controls (lots of ventilation) should be used during the foam application.

 

Homeowners definitely need to be out of the house during application and for the manufacturer's recommended period afterwards.  We also recommend that pets be out of the house.  Installers need to be protected from exposure during this period as well.

Thanks Jon, we do all of the above with the exception of the homeownerns leaving. They are denied access to where the foam is being applied and we ventilate.

 

 

As a manufacturer of low pressure SPF, Fomo has done multiple air monitoring studies.  Our Product Stewardship Guidelines outline a typical air monitoring study done in Connecticut. I have tried to attach this, but it can also be found at www.fomo.com.  You can see on page 9 that the concentrations detected were well below OSHA limits.  It's great that you are ventilating and wearing the proper PPE, however, we would agree with Jon that the occupants should vacate during the work and with Handi-Foam SPF for one hour after you have stopped spraying, this typically gives you enough time to clean-up and the homeowner can be back home. 

Attachments:

InsulSmart is a two-part aminoplast interior foam insulation offered by cfiFOAM, Inc. based in Knoxville, TN. InsulSmart - when tested per ASTM D-5116 @ "full chamber"-  showed low emissions rapidly declining from 24.6 ppb @ 7-days, to 6.5 ppb @ 14-days,  to 0.8 ppb @ 21-days, and to less than 0.8 ppb @ 28-days, which is pretty close to zero emissions. The product's low emissions reflect 1) processing to remove virtually all free-formaldehyde prior to packaging; 2) sophisticated cross-linking chemistry that reduces formaldehyde emissions to levels below ambient in many instances.

A report of ASTM D-5116 is attached along with a summary of various federal agency's guidelines. For product information and to view a short video clip, go to www.cfifoam.com.

Attachments:

RSS

Forum Discussions

Electro Magnetic Fields (EMF)

Started by Barry L NewDelman in General Forum. Last reply by Brad Cook 9 hours ago. 4 Replies

When is it too windy to use blower door?

Started by Brandon Walton in General Forum. Last reply by Kent Browning 15 hours ago. 15 Replies

Affordable Housing Funding

Started by SUZETT MOFFITT in General Forum. Last reply by John Nicholas 21 hours ago. 5 Replies

Latest Activity

Brad Cook replied to Barry L NewDelman's discussion Electro Magnetic Fields (EMF)
"EMFs are everywhere and in varying strengths and frequencies. In my experience a small percentage…"
9 hours ago
Victor Rols Lindsay commented on A. Tamasin Sterner's photo
Thumbnail

improper venting

"whiskey tango foxtrot. This is why we all get ridiculed. Less knowledgeable people  abound.…"
11 hours ago
Victor Rols Lindsay commented on Eric Aune's photo
Thumbnail

infrared

"I guess a picture IS worth a thousand words"
12 hours ago
Victor Rols Lindsay commented on Michael Dunseith's photo
Thumbnail

Proof is possible Tour - Corbett Lungsford

"So... what did you find? This will be fascinating, with some surprises?"
12 hours ago

Photos

Loading…
  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2017   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service