Does anyone have experience or an opinion on Aeroseal duct leakage sealing system?

Views: 9019

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

There was a previous thread on this, I think, maybe 6 months ago?


Thanks for the info on the past discussion on this product. I should have searched first before I posted


For reference, we have a local HVAC contractor that has been doing this for years.  In performing QA on a utility rebate, I questioned the home owner on the work he had done and found that "Dayco" had performed the aeroseal process on his ducts along with replacing the furnace.  I remember the duct leakage numbers being well below the rebate target of 10% of conditioned floor area with a cost of about $1,000 or so.  Standard duct sealing with mastic and hand contact with the ductwork runs around $400-500 in our area.

Taking into account whether or not ducts are accessable and/ or insulated under a pile of attic insulation may result in the Aeroseal process being the more efficient way to go, especially if you have to re-blow portions of the attic or re-wrap the ducts.

Here is their link.


I went to a product demo at their offices. The product preformed well and i really think it will work well. My problem is that the costs to the home owner is about double what they say it will be. In my area of New York labor is high and insurance is higher two items that leave out of their projected costs.
Eliot-----------thanks for the reply. When you say the labor and insurance were left out, is that the way it was suggested that the job is quoted. That is very unusual.
no it was the way they tried to say you can make a fast $1000 at $1500 to the home owner. but in reality it cost you more to actually do the work due to the other costs they didnt include.
You make a good point, Eliot. Home owner costs are different in different regions. And in New York, where everything is more expensive (median home prices near $500k) home owner costs will certainly be higher than average. Aeroseal says the average (nationwide) cost to home owners is $1,100 - $1,500. Gross margins for service providers is somewhere around 25%-50%. That's "gross" not "net". I would think this is more than enough to cover labor and insurance costs - and quite a viable option for pros looking to expand their home energy conservation services. 



Just an fyi, there were problems within Carrier when they owned the rights and the project/technology was shelved just as their second generation of machine was hitting the market.  Aeroseal was sold and is now back on the market under the Aeroseal name.


We are now a dealer for Aeroseal and could not be more happy with the results we've been getting.  The process is labor intensive to get setup (removing register covers, blocking and sealing boots, etc...), but the sealing process works great.  We were just called in to help out with a house for one of our Raters (we are a RESNET Rating and Rater Training Provider, and BPI Affilliate), that works on houses for Habitat.  One of their homes was going to fail Energy Star because of duct leakage (they had tried to seal the ducts themselves but caught the problem too late after drywall)- we came in and we're able to take total supply leakage from 369 CFM@25 to under 60 and the the cavity ducted returns from over 400 CFM to approximately 44 CFM@25.


In another example - a house with two separate air handlers and duct systems - we were able to reduce the total system leakage (boots, ducts, air handler, etc...) by over 80%.  The house was only 6 years old, and the return and supply were metal rectangular trunks with round branch ducts.  Both systems had over 400 CFM of supply leakage, and about equal return leakage (not including the boots).  Given both systems total flows were only about 1,300 CFM (actual measured flows), that means over 30% was being lost to floor cavities, wall cavities and some to the outside.  The home owners saw a 16% reduction in total KWH year over year the first month (with only about 2 weeks of the billing cycle being included after sealing), with the exact same average daily temperature for the month as the year prior.


We'll be putting these examples and more out on our website soon.  Check out our website for more information - Priority Energy , but in short - so far we are really happy with the product.  We operate in Illinois, Wisconsin, Iowa, Michigan and Indiana.



Could anyone give me an idea of investment cost of this system....?



  • Add Videos
  • View All


Latest Activity

Debra Little posted a video

Building Carbon Zero 2015, PHCA

Building Carbon Zero 2015. Passive House CA with City of Palo Alto 2015 summit. Produced by Debra Little. Shot on iPhone 5. Everyone can make videos with the tools in your back pocket!
1 hour ago
Home Energy Magazine's blog post was featured
10 hours ago
Profile IconDave Chamberlain, angela stanzione and Bruce Zahn joined Home Energy Pros
10 hours ago
Paul Holder added a discussion to the group Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase

Blower Door frame

Looking for a blower door frame for Minneapolis blower door. Needing a 2nd. frame if anyone has one…See More
14 hours ago
Joe Urycki replied to Joe Urycki's discussion TEC blower door and UEI combustion analyzer for sale in the group Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase
"Yes, I do still have the equipment.  Are you interested in it?"
Amber Vignieri commented on Amber Vignieri's blog post Even with Polar Vortex, Hourly Pricing Participants Saved
"Thanks for your comment Bob! We couldn't be more excited about the increasing prevalence of…"
Home Energy Magazine posted a blog post
Noah Ray Sanders replied to Steve Mann's discussion TEC Blower Door Frame in the group Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase
"If so please contact me 8329717862 or email"

© 2016   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service