What would you estimate the AFUE is for a 70 year old boiler?

Views: 616

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Hi Mathew,

My gosh, that's older than I am, it must be about as efficient as a camp fire. 

Seriously, that can be done with your combustion analyzer. In states where you are allowed to do so, it is a handy way to put a number on a very important piece of data.  Sometimes the HVAC tech will have left that information from his/her last tune up, but I don't find it very often. 

Here is just one link, I didn't read it all, that discusses combustion efficiency:

http://www.tsi.com/uploadedFiles/Product_Information/Literature/Han...

Bud

PS, I would guess 50 to 60%

Bud,

Thank you for the information.  I will look the link over carefully.  Of course the efficiency of the combustion process is important but this is only a part of the equation.  Over time scale (rust) etc will build up on the heat exchanger and this will cause more heat to go up the stack rather than transfer to the water.  A well serviced unit with high combustion efficiency would still have degraded over time.  There is a service record that indicated an 82% efficiency with 10% CO2.  Not sure how this can used to evaluate if the original AFUE of .65 should be degraded.

Having the combustion efficiency gives you the big part of the AFUE number.  From there you know that the AFUE is lower.  At least you have a basis for determining the combustion efficiency that is better than guessing.

If you have an adjusted heat loss for the home that reflects the actual living conditions and their actual energy used, then you have another path to estimate AFUE, but it is riddled with guesswork.

A typical cast iron boiler, pre 70, would be around 60%.  Yours should be less.  As for the 82% on the service record, being able to generate your own number would increase your confidence in that number.  In my experience, a tech has to get a good number or s/he did not tune the boiler properly, so they get a good number, whether it is correct or not.  Who is checking???

ASHRAE of course has their methods, but not something I have tackled.  In Maine we are prohibited from getting too involved with anything HVAC.  We can run CAZ and the rest is hands off. We can't even drill a hole in the flue if there isn't one, LOL. Here we don't have a line between HVAC and Energy Auditing, we have a concrete wall.

Bud

 

Hi Matthew.  The boilers and steampipes in these pictures are from the original boilers in this hospital when it was built in 1940 or 1941.  I coated these in 1989.  It dropped the skin temperature from 267F down to 155F.  The engineers said this was a 35% reduction in heat loss through the metals and insulation (Asbestos).  If this could help your project, let me know.

 

Hal

I think boiler AFUE is a really tough thing to narrow down.  If a boiler is grossly oversized it will tend to go very cold.  Cycling losses will be huge.  So measuring combustion only tells a very small part of the picture.  

 

Here's an article I found very interesting that you might find helpful:  http://bit.ly/oSyma4

 

The boilers in the pictures of my post have a low fire / high fire system.  They were always on low fire until the temp came down and the high fire mode kicked on for however long.  The only time one would be turned off was for annual servicing, re-mortaring the fire bricks inside, etc,

 

There was a much smaller and newer boiler that served the kitchen area for hot water ony.  That was a off and on system there.

 

Not sure if on / off systemes existed back in the 40's.

 

Sure Hal,

 

I think this is getting away from the OP question though, which I suspect refers to a residential system (this is Home Energy Pros).  

 

I could be wrong, usually am at least once a day and hope to keep that up for a while.    :-)

RSS

Welcome to Home Energy Pros

Welcome to Home Energy Pros – the unique digital community by and for those who work in the home energy performance arena.

Home Energy Pros was founded by the developers of Home Energy Saver Pro (supported by the U.S. Department of Energy) and brought to you in partnership with Home Energy magazine.  Home Energy Pros is sponsored by the Better Buildings Residential Network. Please honor our Guidelines

Blogs

First-Ever Comprehensive National Standard Practice Manual is Updated Guidebook for Energy Efficiency Cost-Benefit Analysis

Posted by Home Energy Magazine on May 23, 2017 at 9:30am 0 Comments

The first-ever comprehensive national guide for utility-funded energy efficiency programs is now available to help utilities, regulators and other interested…

Continue

New Video and Course on Solar PV in Real Estate

Posted by Amber Vignieri on May 16, 2017 at 11:31am 0 Comments

Real estate professionals who understand the basics of solar and know how to market the benefits of an installation will have a market edge. For most real estate agents and appraisers, assessing the value of solar is a new…

Continue

What Happen to Energy Upgrade California?

Posted by Will johnson on May 15, 2017 at 11:43am 0 Comments

Energy Upgrade California offers rebates up to $6,500.00 in SDGE territory.  Up to $4,500 in other territories.  Unfortunately they don't/won't promote it.  I can't get straight candid answers from the contractors supporting the program.  Only…

Continue

Latest Activity

robert jones posted a status
"I have energy auditing equipment for sale. I'm in the 518. 518-209-5912"
9 hours ago
Home Energy Magazine posted a blog post
10 hours ago
Home Energy Magazine posted a video

Gary Nelson, The Energy Conservatory

Gary Nelson- Home Energy Magazine's "Legends of Home Performance" video series. Interviews with pioneer pathfinders of energy and water efficiency.
10 hours ago
Kelly Vaughn posted a blog post
11 hours ago

© 2017   Created by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service